(English by ChatGPT w/ edits)
Today, I’d like to try to organize my thoughts about tragic events.
In recent years, there has been a great deal of condemnation directed at Israel’s conduct in war.
I’m not an expert on Middle Eastern issues, but it does seem to me that in the most recent conflicts there have been many actions worthy of condemnation.
However, when thinking about this issue, I believe we also need to take into account the painful history of modern warfare.
Is Israel an especially egregious state?
Looking at the devastation in Gaza and Lebanon, many people probably feel that way.
But even if Israel were in fact particularly egregious, how does it compare to the United States?
It seems that the number of civilian casualties in America’s “War on Terror” is overwhelmingly higher.
If you think about it, the U.S. experience of 9/11 and Israel’s October 7 share significant similarities in both the scale of the attacks and the nature of what followed.
In each case, the country was attacked, and its national security was clearly under threat. Surrounded by enemies and with limited territory, Israel must have been under even greater pressure than the United States.
However, in the wars that followed, both countries produced many times more civilian casualties than their own losses.
In either case, it raises serious questions about whether such actions can truly be justified.
Looking further back, there is also the example of the Vietnam War. Despite not being directly attacked, the United States perceived a threat and caused immeasurable damage in Vietnam.
Comparing tragedies is not a pleasant exercise, but the wars the United States has waged in recent decades are, at present, on an entirely different scale from Israel’s.
Regardless of historical background, what deserves condemnation should of course be condemned—but I believe it is important to understand the reality accurately.
Perhaps it is time to set aside our preconceptions and reconsider what it really means to call a state “malicious.”